Mastering Voir Dire and Jury Selection: Supplemental Juror Questionnaires
$ 678
Availability: Currently in Stock
Delivery: 10-20 working days
Mastering Voir Dire and Jury Selection: Supplemental Juror Questionnaires
This companion book to Mastering Voir Dire: Gain An Edge in Questioning and Selecting Your Jury, 4th Edition (2018) educates the reader on how to create and use supplemental juror questionnaires. As one of the nation's most experienced trial consultants, Dr. Frederick provides a valuable guide to understanding, creating, and more effectively utilizing supplemental juror questionnaires. Topics covered include:
Basic components of supplemental questionnaires
Methods for using these questionnaires
Benefits in using supplemental questionnaires
Designing questionnaires, including the benefits of different question formats
Tips for phrasing questions
Tips for designing the overall questionnaire
Maximizing the utility of restricted-length questionnaires
After exploring the fundamentals of sound questionnaire design and implementation, this book provides 22 supplemental juror questionnaires from a variety of criminal and civil trials used across the country.  In the criminal area, these trials include Colorado v. James Eagan Holmes (Capital murder-Aurora theater shooting), U.S. v. Conrad Black (fraud), Ohio v. Raymond Tensing (murder-police shooting), U.S.v. William Baroni Jr. and Bridget Anne Kelly (public corruption-Bridgegate scandal), U.S. v. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev (Boston Marathon bombing), Colorado v. Kobe Bryant (sexual assault/rape), and U.S.v. Maj. Nidal Hasan (capital court-martial, Fort Hood shooting), among others. Supplemental juror questionnaires from civil trials include In re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust Litigation (antitrust), Earl Washington Jr. v. Kenneth Buraker et al.(violation of civil rights), In re Exxon Valdez (environmental damage from oil spill), i4i LP v. Microsoft Corporation (patent), Texas v. American Tobacco Company et al. (tobacco product liability), and David Mueller v. Taylor Swift et al. (tortious interference with a contract/assault and battery), among others.